![]() |
||
New Jersey GedQ. Almost certainly spending more money would improve the education of those students. But, the point was (I think) that NJ already spends an unusually high amount of money, and yet isn't getting efficient returns on it. Who knows whether New Jersey is or is not getting an "efficient" return? Presumably you do, since you know whether spending more money in New Jersey schools is important (or think you know). If you've got a kid from a non-English speaking home who lives in a tenament and whose (single) mom would prefer to spend money on drugs and lottery tickets rather than on books and food, just graduating that kid from high school with minimum competancy might be as much a 'success' as getting Chelsea Clinton into Stanford. Besides some absurdo stereotyping of people from New Jersery, what, exactly, is the argument re the importance of money here? A. Nonsense - I've no idea whether New Jersey needs more funding or not. Perhaps, given the demographics of their school age population, they are getting reasonable results with the resources they currently utilize. Or, perhaps they are wasting large amounts of money and could do more with less. But the point was not whether NJ needs more or less money than they currently are spending. The point was that the two statistics of New Jersey's average spending per pupil and average student acheivement levels are meaningless with out some examination of the demographics of the New Jersey student population as well as the cost of living in New Jersey. It would, in addition, be useful to examine just -what- is included in the NJ average spending per pupil number - some states and school districts tuck all sorts of "extra" programs in their school budgets while others fund those types of programs through other agencies. For instance, if New Jersey funds its GED programs through the local school districts, its K-12 educational costs would appear higher than in another state, such as Oregon, which funds its GED programs through the community colleges, even though they might be spending identical amounts on GED programs. The -costs- would be the same - but only in New Jersey would those costs be included in the K-12 "average spending per student" figures. There is no stereotyping - just a statement that the numbers previously presented tell us -nothing- about what the demographics of, or the reasonably expected success rate for, New Jersey school kids might be. As to the importance of money, well that seems self-evident. If you want an English as a Second language teacher to help with kids from non- English speaking backgrounds, ya' gotta -hire- an ESL teacher with MONEY. A school district with few or no kids from non-English speaking homes needs to hire few or no ESL teachers while a district with lots of kids who don't speak English needs to hire lots. Hiring lots of ESL teachers costs more money than hiring few or none. Other Questions : Free Pharmacy Continuing EducationWell i want to find free online pharmacy CE. Anyone know of some FREE on-line pharmacy CE sites?Tech Lectures which provides affordable/excellent CE specifically for Pharmacy Technicians is now offering 20 hours of CE for only 24 Dollars. This p... Massage Continuing EducationI also become quite "nervous" when I saw remarks as "why do I need so many hours just to rub someone's feet?" I can tell you why - because massage therapy is not just a feel good business. It has direct coralation to specific physical/mental ... Get Your GedI'm 16 and expecting my first! I'm due in August and going into grade 11 next fall. I want to bf my baby but I won't have time since I will be at school all day starting September! I talked with my mom about it and she mentioned relacktating (sp?... Free Ged Class OnlineI am now trying to get my GED cuz i had to drop out of high school. But the problem is that i want to study at home. Please help me to find a site that give me a study guide.I found a couple sites you might want to check out: http://www.free-e... Top teacher to quit over continuing-education costsThe push for continuing certification are a function of the belief that teachers aren't properly trained, don't know their subjects, or are generally stupid. Any ideas?While I think that perception exists and does negatively impact teaching, I'...
|
Submit a Learning QuestionLearning FAQ SubjectsOther Learning SitesSite Information |
|
©2007 Schools In! All Right Reserved. |
||